<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BenchAddix &#187; aironet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benchaddix.com/tag/aironet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benchaddix.com</link>
	<description>Resource for IT Professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:46:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Misconfigured Cisco AP could allow unwanted access</title>
		<link>http://benchaddix.com/2010/06/30/misconfigured-cisco-ap-could-allow-unwanted-access/</link>
		<comments>http://benchaddix.com/2010/06/30/misconfigured-cisco-ap-could-allow-unwanted-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 03:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nerm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aironet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benchaddix.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to an article at networkworld researchers have found a potential security risk in Cisco&#8217;s Aironet 1200 Series Access Points if the devices are configured incorrectly. This is not an actual bug as it has more to do with user error. &#8220;The issue has to do with Cisco&#8217;s Aironet 1200 Series Access Point, which is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to an article at <a href="http://www.networkworld.com" target="_blank">networkworld</a> researchers have found a potential security risk in Cisco&#8217;s Aironet  1200 Series Access Points if the devices are configured incorrectly. This is not an actual bug as it has more to do with user error.</p>
<p><span id="more-16"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The issue has to do with Cisco&#8217;s <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/">Aironet  1200 Series Access Point</a>, which is used to power centrally managed  wireless LANs. The Aironet 1200 can be set to a WPA (Wi-Fi Protected  Access) migration    mode, in which it provides wireless access for devices that use  either the insecure WEP (Wired Equivalent Privacy) protocol    or the more secure WPA standard.</p>
<p>This gives companies a way to gradually move from WEP to WPA without  immediately buying all-new, WPA-capable equipment. But    while auditing the network of a customer who used the product, Core  researchers discovered that even networks that had stopped    using WEP devices could still be vulnerable, so long as the Aironet&#8217;s  migration mode was enabled.</p>
<p>Researchers were able to force the access point to issue WEP  broadcast packets, which they then used to crack the encryption    key and gain access to the network.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Anyone that is using this series of access points from Cisco might want to check and make sure that migration mode is not enabled unless absolutely necessary.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/062810-misconfigured-cisco-gear-could-lead.html?t51hb" target="_blank">networkworld</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benchaddix.com/2010/06/30/misconfigured-cisco-ap-could-allow-unwanted-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

